:)) no Redmarxi, muzes si myslet co chces, ale myslis si to chybne a jednoduse neni :))
APU Ryzen neni Ryzen 2..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wt3ICiOcq1g

"AMD’s new Ryzen APUs arrive just two months before the launch of their upcoming second generation Ryzen CPUs. While the new APUs out today still use a 14 nanometer (nm) manufacturing process, AMD’s so-called Ryzen+ CPUs will all be 12nm chips, making them more power efficient and better able to regulate their clock speeds under load. It’s not yet certain how much of a speed boost they’ll deliver, but I’ll let you know as soon as I’ve been able to test them first-hand."

Remarxi..jeden by myslel, ze takovy zakladni veci vis, kdyz tady diskutujes pod kazdym clankem ;)

Chipset B450 je úplně zbytečný produkt, v zásadě je to to samé jako X470. Takže by bohatě stačili X470 a A420 a nebo přestat dělat úplně krávu ve stylu Intel a udělat jen jeden chipset co bude umět všechno a nazdar.

Mne slo jen o to, ze Intel treba vyda procesor aza nekolik mesicu desku, proc to nevydaji zaroven? Nechapu proc dela Intel takhle nelogicke veci a jeste vic nechapu, ze se AMD pripojilo taky a ze nedokazali vydat zaroven RyZen 2000 + X470 + B450.

Ja sa v tom vyznám. ale bežný používateľ sa v tom nemusí vyznať a ztestov sa zdá, že sa začínajú strácať aj redaktori IT magazínov a dokonca an SW yamestnanci Intelu a AMD sa prestávajú vzynávať dokumentácii svojich HW týmov a tak vie aplikácia zapnúť debug kernelu a tým meniť dáta a kód bežiaceho kernelu v jdrách windows, Linux, BSD,... Ja to nekritizujem ako skutočnosť, ktorá je, len postupy ktorými to vzniká. A ja som proAMD.

support quote/citácia podporujúce konštatovanie

Every major OS maker misread Intel's docs. Now their kernels can be hijacked or crashed
Grab those patches as Chipzilla updates manuals
By Simon Sharwood and Chris Williams 9 May 2018

Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD, and some implementations of Xen have a design flaw that could allow attackers to, at best, crash Intel and AMD-powered computers.

At worst, miscreants can, potentially, "gain access to sensitive memory information or control low-level operating system functions,”

In other words, programmers misunderstood Intel and AMD's manuals, which may not have been very clear.

To exploit this situation, the instruction immediately after the POP SS instruction has to be an INT instruction, which triggers an interrupt. These software-generated interrupts are sometimes used by user programs to activate the kernel so it can do work for the running process, such as open a file.

On Intel and AMD machines, the software-generated interrupt instruction immediately after POP SS causes the processor to enter the kernel's interrupt handler. Then the debug exception fires, because POP SS caused the exception to be deferred to avoid the stack being in an inconsistent state.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/09/intel_amd_kernel_privilege_esca...

"Intel vyžaduje co CPU to jiná deska"

nn, co 2 generace, to jiná deska.